• Y Barkana, M Stein, R Maor, M Lynn, and A Eldad.
• Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Surgeon General Headquarters.
• J Trauma. 1999 Jan 1;46(1):176-80.

BackgroundPrehospital blood transfusion for hemorrhaging trauma patients has been used infrequently and is controversial. Currently, there is no satisfactory nonsanguineous fluid therapy for use during prolonged transport, such as in military or rural trauma.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed prehospital data and hospital charts of all trauma patients in Israel who had received prehospital blood transfusion during a period of 30 months.ResultsForty patients received 60 U of Rh-positive type O packed red blood cells. Mean time from injury to hospital admission was 120 minutes. Twenty-one of 31 patients admitted to the hospital alive (68%) received additional blood transfusions during the initial resuscitation phase, justifying the prehospital transfusion. Of nine documented admissions with hemoglobin of less than 7 g/dL, one patient died of exsanguination. There was one case of a minor adverse reaction that could be attributed to prehospital transfusion.ConclusionPrehospital blood transfusion is justified in certain trauma patients, especially when long prehospital transport is required. Blood may be safely maintained and used by physicians with little experience in care of major trauma.

18 keywords...

hide…