• Intensive care medicine · Aug 2010

    Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Adaptive support ventilation versus conventional ventilation for total ventilatory support in acute respiratory failure.

    • Giorgio A Iotti, Andrea Polito, Mirko Belliato, Daniela Pasero, Gaetan Beduneau, Marc Wysocki, Josef X Brunner, Antonio Braschi, Laurent Brochard, Jordi Mancebo, V Marco Ranieri, Jean-Christophe M Richard, and Arthur S Slutsky.
    • Anestesia e Rianimazione 2, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S Matteo, Vle Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy. g.iotti@smatteo.pv.it
    • Intensive Care Med. 2010 Aug 1;36(8):1371-9.

    ObjectiveTo compare the short-term effects of adaptive support ventilation (ASV), an advanced closed-loop mode, with conventional volume or pressure-control ventilation in patients passively ventilated for acute respiratory failure.DesignProspective crossover interventional multicenter trial.SettingSix European academic intensive care units.PatientsEighty-eight patients in three groups: patients with no obvious lung disease (n = 22), restrictive lung disease (n = 36) or obstructive lung disease (n = 30).InterventionsAfter measurements on conventional ventilation (CV) as set by the patients' clinicians, each patient was switched to ASV set to obtain the same minute ventilation as during CV (isoMV condition). If this resulted in a change in PaCO(2), the minute ventilation setting of ASV was readjusted to achieve the same PaCO(2) as in CV (isoCO(2) condition).Measurements And ResultsCompared with CV, PaCO(2) during ASV in isoMV condition and minute ventilation during ASV in isoCO(2) condition were slightly lower, with lower inspiratory work/minute performed by the ventilator (p < 0.01). Oxygenation and hemodynamics were unchanged. During ASV, respiratory rate was slightly lower and tidal volume (Vt) slightly greater (p < 0.01), especially in obstructed patients. During ASV there were different ventilatory patterns in the three groups, with lower Vt in patients with restrictive disease and prolonged expiratory time in obstructed patients, thus mimicking the clinicians' choices for setting CV. In three chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients the resulting Vt was unacceptably high.ConclusionsComparison between ASV and CV resulted either in similarities or in minor differences. Except for excessive Vt in a few obstructed patients, all differences were in favor of ASV.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.