-
- Nicola Sverzellati, Athol U Wells, Sara Tomassetti, Sujal R Desai, Susan J Copley, Zelena A Aziz, Maurizio Zompatori, Marco Chilosi, Andrew G Nicholson, Venerino Poletti, and David M Hansell.
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Parma Padiglione Barbieri, University Hospital of Parma, V. Gramsci 14, 43100 Parma, Italy. nicolasve@tiscali.it
- Radiology. 2010 Mar 1;254(3):957-64.
PurposeTo document the spectrum of misleading thin-section computed tomographic (CT) diagnoses in patients with biopsy-proved idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).Materials And MethodsThis study had institutional review board approval, and patient consent was not required. Three observers, blinded to any clinical information and the purpose of the study, recorded thin-section CT differential diagnoses and assigned a percentage likelihood to each for a group of 123 patients (79 men, 44 women; age range, 27-82 years) with various chronic interstitial lung diseases, including a core group of 55 biopsy-proved cases of IPF. Patients with IPF in the core group, in whom IPF was diagnosed as low-grade probability (<30%) by at least two observers, were considered to have atypical IPF cases, and the alternative diagnoses were analyzed further.ResultsThirty-four (62%) of 55 biopsy-proved IPF cases were regarded as alternative diagnoses. In these atypical IPF cases, the first-choice diagnoses, expressed with high degree of probability, were nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP; 18 [53%] of 34), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP; four [12%] of 34), sarcoidosis (three [9%] of 34), and organizing pneumonia (one [3%] of 34); in eight (23%) of 34 cases, no single diagnosis was favored by more than one observer. Frequent differential diagnoses, although not always the first-choice diagnosis, were NSIP (n = 29), chronic HP (n = 23), and sarcoidosis (n = 9).ConclusionIn the correct clinical setting, a diagnosis of IPF is not excluded by thin-section CT appearances more suggestive of NSIP, chronic HP, or sarcoidosis. (c) RSNA, 2010.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.