-
Review Case Reports
Controversies in the treatment of cervical spine dislocations.
- Joon Y Lee, Ahmad Nassr, Jason C Eck, and Alexander R Vaccaro.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Kaufmann Building, Suite 1010, 3471 5th Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. joonyunglee@yahoo.com
- Spine J. 2009 May 1;9(5):418-23.
Background ContextCervical spine dislocations represent an area of great controversy among spine surgeons.PurposeThe purpose of this review is to present the specific areas of controversy and to provide a review of the literature.Study DesignA case of cervical spine dislocation is presented to illustrate the major controversies related to the treatment of cervical spine dislocations.MethodsA review of the literature is presented regarding the major controversial aspects of the treatment of cervical spine dislocations.ResultsThe major areas of controversy include the choice of imaging, closed versus open reduction and surgical approach.ConclusionsGuidelines for the management of cervical spine dislocations are presented based on evidence-based medicine.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.