-
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi · Dec 2010
[Effectiveness of posterior malleolus fixation in treating ankle fracture].
- Wen Zhao, Peifu Tang, Haizhou Peng, and Taimao Zhao.
- Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Aerospace General Hospital, Beijing 100076, PR China. zw20897@hotmail.com
- Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Dec 1;24(12):1432-6.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of posterior malleolus fixation on the function of ankle in patients with ankle fracture.MethodsBetween June 2007 and June 2009, 110 patients with ankle fracture were treated with posterior malleolus fixation in 59 patients (fixation group) or without fixation in 51 patients (non-fixation group). In fixation group, there were 31 males and 28 females with an average age of 62.6 years (range, 19-75 years); the causes of injury included traffic accident (20 cases), falling (18 cases), and sprain (21 cases) with a disease duration of 1-3 days (2.2 days on average); and the locations were left ankle in 32 cases and right ankle in 27 cases, including 6 cases of type I, 23 of type II, 19 of type III, and 11 of type IV according to the ankle fracture classification. In non-fixation group, there were 38 males and 13 females with an average age of 64.5 years (range, 16-70 years); the causes of injury included traffic accident (15 cases), falling (12 cases), and sprain (24 cases) with a disease duration of 1-3 days (2.5 days on average); and the locations were left ankle in 22 cases and right ankle in 29 cases, including 8 cases of type I, 16 of type II, 19 of type III, and 8 of type IV according to the ankle fracture classification. There was no significant difference in general data between 2 groups (P > 0.05).ResultsAll patients of 2 groups achieved wound healing by first intention. The patients were followed up 12-18 months (16 months on average). X-ray films showed that fractures healed at 8-12 weeks (10 weeks on average) in fixation group and at 10-14 weeks (12 weeks on average) in non-fixation group. There were significant differences in the clinical score (89.28 +/- 8.62 vs. 86.88 +/- 9.47, P < 0.05), postoperative reposition score (33.34 +/- 2.15 vs. 31.24 +/- 2.89, P < 0.05), and osteoarthritis score (13.22 +/- 1.66 vs. 12.46 +/- 2.03, P < 0.05) according to Phillips ankle scoring system between 2 groups at last follow-up. There was no significant difference in clinical score of type I and II patients between 2 groups (P > 0.05), but significant differences were found in clinical score and osteoarthritis score of type III and IV patients between 2 groups (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in the postoperative reposition score between 2 groups in all types of fractures (P < 0.05).ConclusionThe posterior malleolus fixation may provide satisfactory clinical functional outcomes for ankle fracture. Proper fracture classification and correct method of internal fixation are important for achieving good reduction and improving the long-term results.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.