• Intensive care medicine · Apr 2001

    Clinical Trial

    Usefulness of a strategy based on bronchoscopy with direct examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in the initial antibiotic therapy of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.

    • J F Timsit, C Cheval, B Gachot, F Bruneel, M Wolff, J Carlet, and B Regnier.
    • Clinique de réanimation des maladies infectieuses, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. jf.timsit@outcomerea.org
    • Intensive Care Med. 2001 Apr 1;27(4):640-7.

    ObjectivesTo evaluate (a) the routine accuracy of bronchoalveolar lavage by direct examination (BAL-D) in diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and (b) the impact of a diagnostic strategy including clinical judgment, bronchoscopy, and BAL-D on the initial diagnosis and appropriateness of treatment when VAP is suspected.Design And SettingProspective cohort study in two academic ICUs in Paris, France.Patients And ParticipantsMechanically ventilated patients with suspected VAP underwent bronchoscopy with BAL and protected specimen brush (PSB). BAL-D results were available within 2 h, BAL on culture and PSB results after 24 h, and antibiotic susceptibility after 48 h. At each step in the strategy the senior and the resident in charge of the patient were asked their diagnosis and their therapeutic plan on the basis of presently available data. Definite diagnosis of suspected VAP was based on histology, appearance of cavitation, positive pleural fluid culture, results of PSB and BAL culture, and follow-up.Measurement And ResultsA total of 110 episodes of suspected VAP were studied; 94 definite diagnoses were made (47 VAP, 47 no VAP). Using a threshold 1% of infected cells, BAL-D discriminated well between patients with and those without VAP (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 91.5%, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.953). The senior clinical judgment was correct in 71% cases. It was correct in 78% and 94% of cases after airway visualization and BAL-D findings, respectively. After BAL-D the positive and negative predictive values in diagnosing VAP were 90% and 98%, respectively. However, the therapeutic plan was correct in only 65% using clinical judgment (15 untreated patients, 3 ineffective treatment, 15 useless treatment), 66% using airway visualization (14 untreated VAP, 4 ineffective treatment, 14 useless treatment), and 88% using BAL-D results (1 untreated patients, 6 ineffective, 4 useless), according to definite diagnosis and final antibiotic susceptibility testings.ConclusionsA strategy based on bronchoscopy and BAL-D generally leads to a rapid and appropriate treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated patients.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…