• Katrine Jensen, Charlotte Ringsted, Henrik Jessen Hansen, René Horsleben Petersen, and Lars Konge.
• Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Thoraxkirurgisk afd. 2152, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark, katrine.jensen@regionh.dk.
• Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun 1;28(6):1821-9.

BackgroundVideo-assisted thoracic surgery is gradually replacing conventional open thoracotomy as the method of choice for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancers, and thoracic surgical trainees must learn and master this technique. Simulation-based training could help trainees overcome the first part of the learning curve, but no virtual-reality simulators for thoracoscopy are commercially available. This study aimed to investigate whether training on a laparoscopic simulator enables trainees to perform a thoracoscopic lobectomy.MethodsTwenty-eight surgical residents were randomized to either virtual-reality training on a nephrectomy module or traditional black-box simulator training. After a retention period they performed a thoracoscopic lobectomy on a porcine model and their performance was scored using a previously validated assessment tool.ResultsThe groups did not differ in age or gender. All participants were able to complete the lobectomy. The performance of the black-box group was significantly faster during the test scenario than the virtual-reality group: 26.6 min (SD 6.7 min) versus 32.7 min (SD 7.5 min). No difference existed between the two groups when comparing bleeding and anatomical and non-anatomical errors.ConclusionSimulation-based training and targeted instructions enabled the trainees to perform a simulated thoracoscopic lobectomy. Traditional black-box training was more effective than virtual-reality laparoscopy training. Thus, a dedicated simulator for thoracoscopy should be available before establishing systematic virtual-reality training programs for trainees in thoracic surgery.

23 keywords...

hide…