• Pediatric neurosurgery · Mar 2003

    Spinal dysraphism: trends in northern India.

    • Raj Kumar and S N Singh.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India. rajkumar@sgpgi.ac.in
    • Pediatr Neurosurg. 2003 Mar 1;38(3):133-45.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical profiles, image findings and surgical outcome of 155 cases of spinal dysraphism.Methods155 patients were studied prospectively (143) or retrospectively (12). The male to female ratio was 1.5:1. Mean age at presentation was 5.7 years. Out of 155 cases of spinal dysraphism, 119 had open spina bifida [meningomyelocele (MMC) in 113 (72%), meningocele in 3 (2%) and myelocystocele in 3 (2%)] and 36 had occult spina bifida [split cord malformation (SCM) without overt MMC sac (pure SCM) in 29 (19%) and midline dermal sinus in 7 (4.5%)]. Lipomeningomyelocele constituted 73 of the 113 cases of MMC (65%). Twenty cases of MMC (18%) had associated SCM (complex spina bifida). The total number of cases with SCM was 49 (32%). Twenty-four children with MMC presented with an operative scar from previous surgery, performed at the periphery. After a detailed clinical evaluation of all patients, craniospinal MRI was the preferable mode of investigation. All patients underwent surgery and were clinically assessed over a mean follow-up period of 3.6 years.ResultsMMC sac was the commonest skin manifestation seen in 89/155 cases (57%). Hypertrichosis and previous operative scar were noticed in 24 cases each (15%). Cutaneous hemangioma, skin tag and multiple neurofibroma were the other common superficial skin manifestations. Clinically, 103 patients (66.5%) had variable weakness of the lower limbs, and muscle atrophy was noticed in 56 cases (41%). Graded sensory loss, sphincteric dysfunction, trophic ulcer and backache were present in 89 (57%), 64 (36%), 17 (11%) and 9 cases (6%), respectively. Significant scoliosis in 56 cases (36%) and congenital talipes equinovarus in 51 cases (33%) were the most frequent neuroorthopedic deformities apart from high-arched foot, leg length discrepancy and flat foot. Common image findings were low-lying cord in 101 (65%), neural placode in 76/113 (49%), hydrosyrinx in 42 (27%), hydrocephalus in 71 (46%) and Chiari malformation in 62 cases (45%). The lumbosacral region in 56 cases (38%), followed by the lumbar region in 47 (30%), were the most common sites of occurrence of spina bifida. Of 71 hydrocephalic patients, 39 (55%) needed shunting before definitive surgery and 21 (30%) after the surgery. Eleven patients (15%) did not require shunting at all. CSF leak in 51 patients (33%), pseudomeningocele in 26 (17%), wound infection in 22 (14%) and meningitis in 13 (8%) were the most common postoperative complications. Two patients died in the postoperative period. During an average follow-up of 3.6 years (range 1.5-8 years), motor weakness improved in 47 children (45%) and remained static in 53 (52%), and 3 children showed deterioration in motor power. Sensory dysfunction improved in 43 (48%), remained static in 42 (47%) and deteriorated in 4 patients (4%). Sphincteric function clinically improved in 26 patients (41%) and was static in 38 (59%), and 6 patients (4%) had deterioration. Backache was dramatically relieved in all 9 patients with this complaint (100%). In 13 children with trophic ulcer (76%), it completely healed.ConclusionA significant proportion of patients with open spinal dysraphism harbor an underlying SCM, an entity coined complex spina bifida (in our previous study). The incidence of hydrocephalus in spinal dysraphism is low in India in comparison to the Western world. Some patients with mild hydrocephalus on scan may not require a shunt operation. Surgical intervention should be early after entire neural axis screening by MRI.Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…