• J Spinal Disord Tech · Nov 2013

    Effect of An Annular Closure Device (Barricaid) on Same Level Recurrent Disc Herniation and Disc Height Loss After Primary Lumbar Discectomy: Two-Year Results of a Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study.

    • Scott L Parker, Gordan Grahovac, Duje Vukas, Milorad Vilendecic, Darko Ledic, Matthew J McGirt, and Eugene J Carragee.
    • *Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN †University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia ‡Localitet Susak Neurosurgery, Rijeka, Croatia §Department of Orthopedics, Stanford University.
    • J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Nov 5.

    Study Design:Prospective cohort study.Objective:Evaluate if an annular closure device could be implanted safely, reduce same-level recurrent disc herniation, or attenuate disc height loss and improve outcome after lumbar discectomy.Summary Of Background Data:Same-level recurrent disc herniation, disc height loss, and progressive degeneration are common complications and sequellae after lumbar discectomy. Techniques to reduce these consequences may improve outcomes.Methods:Forty-six consecutive patients undergoing lumbar discectomy for single-level herniated disc at two institutions were prospectively followed with clinical and radiographic evaluations at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months (control cohort). A second consecutive cohort of 30 patients undergoing 31 lumbar discectomies with implantation of an annular closure device was similarly followed. Incidence of recurrent disc herniation, disc height loss, leg and back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed at each follow-up.Results:Cohorts were well matched at baseline. By two-years follow-up, symptomatic recurrent same-level disc herniation occurred in 3(6.5%) patients in the control cohort versus 0(0%) patients in the annular repair cohort (P=0.27). A trend of greater preservation of disc height was observed in the annular repair versus control cohort three months (7.9 vs. 7.27 mm, P=0.08), six months (7.81 vs. 7.18 mm, P=0.09), and twelve months post-operatively (7.63 vs. 6.9 mm, P=0.06). Annular closure cohort reported less leg pain (VAS-LP: 5 vs. 16, P<0.01), back pain (VAS-BP: 13 vs. 22, P<0.05), and disability (ODI: 16 vs. 22, P<0.05) one-year post-operatively.Conclusions:Implantation of a novel annular repair device was associated with greater maintenance of disc height and improved one-year leg pain, back pain, and low-back disability. Recurrent disc herniation did not occur in any patients after annular repair. Closure of annular defect after lumbar discectomy may help preserve physiologic disc function and prevent long-term disc height loss and associated back and leg pain.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.