• David M Greer and Gioacchino G Curiale.
• Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. david.greer@yale.edu
• Semin Neurol. 2013 Apr 1;33(2):157-66.

AbstractConsulting neurologists are often asked to evaluate patients in acute nontraumatic coma. The authors review prognostication of functional outcomes, determining brain death, and managing end-of-life care. Prognostication of outcome after cardiac arrest in comatose patients is a frequently encountered scenario with high-stakes implications. However, current guidelines are limited by a failure to address the use of therapeutic hypothermia and thus may lead to overly pessimistic outcome prediction. Pupillary light responses and corneal reflexes remain highly predictive clinical signs of a poor prognosis. Motor responses have a high false-positive rate for predicting a poor outcome, especially in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Ancillary testing with electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials, serum neuron-specific enolase, and neuroimaging is often useful in predicting outcomes. Brain death is a clinical condition of irreversible coma of known cause with absent brainstem reflexes and apnea. An understanding of the value of confirmatory testing and the potential for confounding factors is essential in making a correct diagnosis. As coma carries a high mortality rate, neurologists must be capable of guiding goals of care, discussing end-of-life issues, and understanding organ-procurement procedures.Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

11 keywords...

hide…