• Teresa S Jones, Clay Cothren Burlew, Jeffrey L Johnson, Edward Jones, Lucy Z Kornblith, Walter L Biffl, Robert T Stovall, Fredric M Pieracci, Philip F Stahel, and Ernest E Moore.
• Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado Denver, 777 Bannock Street, Denver, CO 80204, USA.
• Am. J. Surg. 2015 Feb 1;209(2):363-8.

BackgroundThe need for mechanical ventilation (MV) after spinal cord injury (SCI) is a risk factor for prolonged critical care. The "purpose" of this study was to identify the level of cervical SCI that requires MV, thereby defining candidates for tracheostomy.MethodsPatients with cervical SCI over a 15-year period were reviewed.ResultsOne hundred sixty-three patients sustained cervical SCI. Of 76 complete injuries, 91% required MV for greater than 48 hours. By injury level, MV incidence was 100% for C2-4, 91% for C5, 79% for C6, and 80% for C7. Only one quarter of patients with incomplete SCI required MV for greater than 48 hours; Glascow Coma Score and Injury Severity Score were significantly worse compared with patients not requiring MV.ConclusionsFactors influencing the decision for tracheostomy in cervical SCI patients include the presence of a complete SCI, anatomic level of injury, Glascow Coma Score, Injury Severity Score, and associated thoracic injury. Patients with complete cervical SCI often require prolonged MV. Conversely, the minority of incomplete SCI required MV; the need for tracheostomy was likely performed for associated injuries. Utilizing identified factors permits a thoughtful approach to tracheostomy in this patient population.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

25 keywords...

hide…