• Ann Emerg Med · Aug 1997

    Comparative Study

    Analysis of parental estimates of children's weights in the ED.

    • S Leffler and M Hayes.
    • University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, USA.
    • Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Aug 1;30(2):167-70.

    Study ObjectiveTo assess the ability of parents to estimate their children's weight.MethodsWe assembled a convenience sample of children, newborn to 5 years, who presented to the ED of a tertiary care hospital. Each child's mother or father was asked to estimate the child's weight as accurately as possible. The triage nurse then weighed the child on an electronic scale. An age-based formula was also used to estimate the child's weight. The parental estimate and the formula-based weight were compared with the weight indicated on the scale.ResultsOne hundred seventeen children were enrolled. The mean age was 26.7 months (range, newborn to 60 months). We analyzed agreement by plotting the percent difference between the weight estimates against the actual weights. The mean +/- SD difference between the parental estimate and the actual weight was 6.8% +/- 9.8%. Parental estimates were accurate to within 10% of the measured weight in 80% of the cases (94 of 117). The mean +/-SD difference between the formula-derived weight and the actual weight was 13.6% +/- 17.5%. The formula was accurate to within 10% of the measured weight in 46% of cases (54 of 117).ConclusionIn 80% of cases, the parental estimate of the child's weight was within 10% of the measured weight. The parental estimate was more accurate than the formula-derived weight.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.