• Zhonghua nei ke za zhi · Oct 2015

    [The application of combined central venous pressure and oxygen metabolism parameters monitoring in diagnosing septic shock-induced left ventricular dysfunction].

    • Keliang Cui, Xiaoting Wang, Hongmin Zhang, Wenzhao Chai, and Dawei Liu.
    • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
    • Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Oct 1; 54 (10): 855-9.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of central venous pressure (CVP), central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂) and venous-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure gradient (Pv-aCO₂)) in the diagnosis of septic shock-induced left ventricular dysfunction.MethodsConsecutive patients with septic shock were enrolled from September 2013 to September 2014 in ICU at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The data of CVP, Pv-aCO₂) and ScvO₂) were recorded and analyzed. According to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) tested by bedside echocardiography, the patients were divided into two groups: new onset of left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) group and non-left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF ≥ 50%) group. A diagnostic model was created by logistic regression. The diagnostic performance and cut-off values of CVP, Pv-aCO₂, ScvO₂) were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsAmong 93 patients enrolled, 39 were diagnosed with left ventricular dysfunction. In the new onset group, CVP [(12.5 ± 3.9) mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) vs (10.4 ± 2.5) mmHg; P = 0.005] and Pv-aCO₂[(7.5 ± 3.9) mmHg vs (4.5 ± 2.6) mmHg; P < 0.001] were significantly higher than those in the non-left ventricular dysfunction group, while Scv2 [(62.4 ± 10.5)% vs (72.6 ± 9.0)%; P < 0.001] was significantly lower. As far as the diagnostic value of these three parameters were concerned for left ventricular dysfunction, the sensitivity of CVP ≥ 12.5 mmHg was 46.2%, specificity 81.5% with an area under ROC curve (AUCROC) 0.674; the sensitivity of Pv-aCO₂≥ 5.0 mmHg 76.9%, specificity 37.0%, AUCROC 0.738; the sensitivity of ScvO₂≤ 65.8% 64.1%, specificity 78.6%, AUCROC 0.775. When the cut-off values were determined by ROC, the diagnostic performance of the model was ≥ 0.377 with the sensitivity, specificity and AUCROC 82.1%, 79.6% and 0.835, respectively.ConclusionIn patients with septic shock, the logistic regression model established by CVP, Pv-aCO₂and ScvO₂contributes to the diagnosis of septic shock-induced left ventricular dysfunction.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.