• Aaron M Brillhart, Thomas D Rea, Linda Becker, Mickey S Eisenberg, and John A Murray.
• University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
• Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Oct 1;6(4):373-7.

UnlabelledThe interval from collapse to electrical rescue shock is a critical determinant of successful defibrillation in cardiac arrest. In order to achieve the earliest possible defibrillation, many emergency medical services (EMS) systems equip first-responding units with an automated external defibrillator (AED).ObjectiveTo measure the time from on-scene emergency medical technician (EMT) recognition of cardiac arrest to AED application and shock in ventricular fibrillation (VF) arrest. In addition, the authors sought to understand the reasons for delays.MethodsUsing the AED recordings and written EMS reports, the authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of all persons who experienced an EMS-attended VF cardiac arrest in which an AED was applied and a shock delivered by an EMT, from January 1999 through December 2000 (n = 177). Based on the bimodal distribution of times, two groups were assembled: no delay (time to shock < or = 90 seconds) and delayed (time to shock > 90 seconds). Patient and event characteristics associated with delay status were determined using Mantel-Haenszel methods.ResultsThe median (25th, 75th percentile) time from cardiac arrest recognition to shock was 51 (43, 64) seconds. Ninety-four percent (n = 166) of the cohort received a shock within 90 seconds. Delayed shock was associated with unwitnessed arrest status (odds ratio = 9.3, 95% confidence interval = 2.3, 36.8) and nursing home location (odds ratio = 10.0, 95% confidence interval = 2.1, 47.5).ConclusionThe findings suggest that a 1-minute goal and a 90-second minimum standard for time to first shock are appropriate for EMT AED defibrillation in the field.

22 keywords...

hide…