• Anaesth Intensive Care · Apr 2001

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    A comparative study of three different methods of administering metaraminol during spinal anaesthesia in the elderly.

    • L A Critchley and S C Yu.
    • Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong and Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, SAR.
    • Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001 Apr 1;29(2):141-8.

    AbstractWe compared three methods of administering metaraminol during spinal (subarachnoid) anaesthesia. Fifty-two elderly patients with fractured hips were studied. Blood pressure was maintained by either intramuscular (i.m.) metaraminol (0.1 mg x kg(-1)), intravenous (i.v.) boluses (0.01 mg x kg(-1)) or an infusion (0.05 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)). Non-invasive blood pressure was recorded every one-minute. Spinal anaesthesia initially decreased the systolic arterial pressure by 15 (14) % compared to 35 (15) % for diastolic pressure (P<0.001). I.m. metaraminol restored the systolic arterial pressure back to baseline values (-3%), but there was significant between-subject variability resulting in a very unpredictable effect. I.v. boluses and infusion had a more predictable effect and maintained systolic arterial pressure at about 20% below baseline. Range of effect, measured by inter-quartile range and variance, was greatest in the i.m. group and least in the infusion group (P<0.003). I.m. metaraminol during spinal anaesthesia has a very unpredictable effect. Infusions of metaraminol provided the best blood pressure control. Diastolic blood pressure fell significantly after spinal anaesthesia and this merits further investigation.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…