• Crit Care · Dec 2003

    Significance of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (an acute phase protein) in monitoring critically ill patients.

    • Miroslav Prucha, Ivan Herold, Roman Zazula, Ladislava Dubska, Miroslav Dostal, Thomas Hildebrand, and Josef Hyanek.
    • Staff, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hematology and Immunology, Hospital Na Homolce, Czech Republic. miroslav.prucha@homolka.cz
    • Crit Care. 2003 Dec 1;7(6):R154-9.

    IntroductionThe present study was conducted to assess the value of serum concentration of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and septic shock with respect to its ability to differentiate between infectious and noninfectious etiologies in SIRS and to predict prognosis.MethodsThis prospective cohort study was conducted in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit. Sixty-eight patients, admitted consecutively to the intensive care unit and who met criteria for SIRS, sepsis or septic shock were included. Serum LBP was measured using an immunochemiluminiscence assay.ResultsSerum levels of LBP were significantly increased in patients with SIRS (n = 40; median 30.6 microg/ml, range 9.2-79.5 microg/ml), sepsis (n = 19; median 37.1 microg/ml, range 11.8-76.2 microg/ml) and septic shock (n = 9; median 59.7 microg/ml, range 31.1-105 microg/ml), as compared with levels in the healthy volunteers (5.1 +/- 2.2 microg/ml; P < 0.0001). Serum LBP at study entry was statistically significantly lower in patients with SIRS than in those with septic shock (P < 0.014); no statistically significant difference existed between patients with SIRS and those with sepsis (P = 0.61). Specificity and sensitivity of an LBP concentration of 29.8 microg/ml to distinguish between infectious and noninfectious etiologies for SIRS were 50% and 74.2%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in LBP concentration between survivors and nonsurvivors in both groups of patients. Furthermore, in septic patients the LBP response appeared to exhibit a decreased magnitude.ConclusionLBP is a nonspecific marker of the acute phase response and cannot be used as a diagnostic tool for differentiating between infectious and noninfectious etiologies of SIRS.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.