• J Satoh, M Yamakage, S I Wasaki, and A Namiki.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
• Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006 Feb 1;34(1):46-50.

AbstractThis study compared the intravenous fluid warming capabilities of three systems at different flow rates. The devices studied were a water-bath warmer, a dry-heat plate warmer, and an intravenous fluid tube warmer Ambient temperature was controlled at 22 degrees to 24 degrees C. Normal saline (0.9% NaCl) at either room temperature (21 degrees to 23 degrees C) or at ice-cold temperature (3 degrees to 5 degrees C) was administered through each device at a range of flow rates (2 to 100 ml/min). To mimic clinical conditions, the temperature of the fluid was measured with thermocouples at the end of a one metre tube connected to the outflow of the warmer for the first two devices and at the end of the 1.2 m warming tubing for the intravenous fluid tube warmer The temperature of fluid delivered by the water bath warmer increased as the flow rate was increased up to 15 to 20 ml/min but decreased with greater flow rates. The temperature of the fluid delivered by the dry-heat plate warmer significantly increased as the flow rate was increased within the range tested (due to decreased cooling after leaving the device at higher flow rates). The temperature of fluid delivered by the intravenous fluid tube warmer did not depend on the flow rate up to 20 ml/min but significantly and fluid temperature-dependently decreased at higher flow rates (>30 ml/min). Under the conditions of our testing, the dry heat plate warmer delivered the highest temperature fluid at high flow rates.

15 keywords...

hide…