• Conor P Delaney, Karen Brady, Donya Woconish, Stavan P Parmar, and Bradley J Champagne.
• Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106-5047, USA. conor.delaney@UHhospitals.org
• Am. J. Surg. 2012 Mar 1;203(3):353-5; discussion 355-6.

BackgroundLearning curves and efficiency concerns have slowed the integration of laparoscopy into colorectal practice. We evaluated our experience with laparoscopic colorectal (LC) surgery using enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs).MethodsOne thousand consecutive LC procedures performed by 2 surgeons over a 5-year period using previously published, standardized ERPs were assessed.ResultsThe mean age was 59, and the mean body mass index was 29.5. Procedures included segmental colectomy (54%), proctectomy (19%), total colectomy (11%), ostomy (5%), and other procedures (11%). Diagnoses included malignancy (41%), diverticulitis (16%), inflammatory bowel disease (13%), and other (30%). The mean operative time was 151 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 55 mL. Conversion to an open surgery occurred in 5.8%, whereas 2.3% were performed using a hand-assist procedure. The mean hospital stay was 4.1 days (median 3), with a 6% readmission rate. Complications (20%) included mortality (0.3%), wound infection (4%), and anastomotic leak (1.4%).ConclusionsLC surgery with ERP offers excellent outcomes with efficient use of resources.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

37 keywords...

hide…