-
- Kristin Sjåvik, Jiri Bartek, Ole Solheim, Tor Ingebrigtsen, Sasha Gulati, Lisa Millgård Sagberg, Petter Förander, and Asgeir Store Jakola.
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
- World Neurosurg. 2016 Apr 1; 88: 320-326.
ObjectivesVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after intracranial meningioma surgery. To what extent systemic prophylaxis with pharmacotherapy is beneficial with respect to VTE risk, or associated with increased risk of bleeding and postoperative hemorrhage, remains debated. The current study aimed to clarify the risk/benefit ratio of prophylactic pharmacotherapy initiated the evening before craniotomy for meningioma.MethodsIn a Scandinavian population-based cohort, we conducted a retrospective review of 979 operations for intracranial meningioma between 2007 and 2013 at 3 neurosurgical centers with population-based referral. We compared 2 different treatment strategies analyzing frequencies of VTE and proportions of postoperative intracranial hematomas requiring surgery or intensified subsequent observation or care (intensive care unit or other intensified observation or treatment). One neurosurgical center favored preoperative prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (LMWH routine group) in addition to mechanical prophylaxis, and 2 centers favored mechanical prophylaxis with LMWH only given as needed in cases of delayed mobilization (LMWH as needed group).ResultsIn the LMWH routine group, VTE was diagnosed after 24/626 operations (3.9%), and VTE was diagnosed after 11/353 (3.1%) operations in the LMWH as needed group (P = 0.56). Clinically relevant postoperative hematomas occurred after 57/626 operations (9.1%) in the LMWH routine group compared with 23/353 (6.5%) in the LMWH as needed group (P = 0.16). Surgically evacuated postoperative hematomas occurred after 19/626 operations (3.0%) in the LMWH routine group compared with 8/353 operations (2.3%) in the LMWH as needed group (P = 0.26).ConclusionsThere is no benefit of routine preoperative LMWH starting before intracranial meningioma surgery. Neither could we for primary outcomes detect a significant increase in clinically relevant postoperative hematomas secondary to this regimen. We suggest that as needed perioperative administration of LMWH, reserved for patients with excess risk because of delayed mobilization, is effective and also appears to be the safest strategy.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.