• Acta oto-laryngologica · Dec 2009

    Treatment outcome in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma larynx and hypopharynx: a follow-up study.

    • Bipin T Varghese, Paul Sebastian, and Aleyamma Mathew.
    • Division of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, India. bipintv@yahoo.co.uk
    • Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 Dec 1;129(12):1480-5.

    ConclusionsCompared with larynx cancers salvage rates are poorer for hypopharyngeal cancers and the role of primary surgery seems to be significantly higher and more decisive in overall survival (OS). Hypopharyngeal cancers therefore warrant a closer follow-up after an organ preservation protocol, to detect recurrence at the earliest stage and plan for an effective salvage surgery.ObjectiveTo evaluate the survival and morbidity of patients treated by surgery for carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx according to site.Patients And MethodsAll patients who had undergone laryngectomy at the Division of Surgical Oncology Regional Cancer Center (RCC) from June 1995 to December 2005 were included in the study, which retrospectively recorded the age and sex distribution, TNM stage, indication, type of laryngectomy and reconstructive option used. The therapeutic outcome, disease-free survival (DFS), OS, voice preservation and postoperative voice rehabilitation were analysed.ResultsOf a total of 167 cases, 123 (74%) had salvage surgery for failed chemoradiotherapy/radical radiotherapy and 44 (26%) had primary surgical treatment. Conservation surgery was undertaken in 4 cases, near total laryngectomy or pharyngectomy (NTL/NTLP) was done in 14 and total laryngectomy (TLPE) with gastric pull up was done in 5. Total laryngectomy (TL) or TL with partial or subtotal pharyngectomy was done in 144 cases. Concomitant neck dissection (ND) was done in 46 cases, 14 posterolateral selective, 15 radical neck dissections (RNDs), 2 extended RNDs, 12 bilateral NDs and 3 modified neck dissections (MNDs). Five patients received platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and nine had postoperative chemotherapy. In 116 patients the pharyngeal remnant was closed primarily, 21 patients had pectoralis major myocutaneous flap patch reconstruction, 18 had tubed pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap reconstruction, 4 had folded (bipaddled) PMMC flap reconstruction, 7 had PMMC and 3 patients had deltopectoral (DP) flap for skin cover. Pathological margin positivity was seen in seven cases and perinodal disease was seen in nine. There was a statistically significant survival difference between salvage and primary surgical cases among cancers of the larynx and hypopharynx. Hypopharyngeal salvage rate was significantly lower in the present study. Sixty-two (37%) patients had postoperative leaks. Five leaks persisted to form pharyngocutaneous fistulae. All of these patients had either wound infection with or without flap necrosis or previous radiation. Two were repaired and in two cases speech prosthesis insertion was possible due its anatomical position. One patient refused further surgical closure after a partially failed repair. Fifty-six (34%) patients recurred locoregionally, 4 (2.3%) patients developed a second primary and 5 (2.9%) had distant metastasis. Thirty patients were voice rehabilitated with an electronic larynx. Seventeen patients had voice prosthesis insertion (6 primary and 10 secondary), 3 patients developed good oesophageal speech and voice preservation was possible in 18 patients. Seventy-nine patients were alive at the time of completing the study.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.