• E K Paulsen, M G Porter, S D Helmer, P W Linhardt, and M L Kliewer.
• Department of Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, 929 North St. Francis, Wichita, KS 67214, USA.
• Am. J. Surg. 2001 Dec 1;182(6):570-7.

BackgroundThis study was undertaken to determine if thoracic epidural analgesia is of practical benefit after bowel resection.MethodsPatients were prospectively randomized to receive either a thoracic epidural or patient-controlled analgesia for pain control after bowel resection. A standardized postoperative protocol was instituted after surgery.ResultsPain scores were significantly lower in the epidural group. Return of bowel function, and interval to discharge was not different between groups. Cost and complication rates were significantly higher in the epidural group.ConclusionsAlthough pain scores were significantly lower in the epidural group, this did not translate into a quicker return of bowel function or earlier discharge of the patient. Furthermore, the epidural group had a significantly higher complication rate and cost. Therefore, while thoracic epidural analgesia provides superior pain control, it does not offer a significant advantage over patient-controlled analgesia in return of bowel function after bowel resection.

17 keywords...

hide…