• Klin Monbl Augenheilkd · Sep 2011

    [Prognostic factors and visual outcome for open globe injuries with intraocular foreign bodies].

    • O A Maneschg, M Resch, A Papp, and J Németh.
    • Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Semmelweis Universität, Budapest. ottomaneschg@hotmail.com
    • Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011 Sep 1;228(9):801-7.

    AimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features as well as the visual results and determine the prognostic factors after the removal of retained intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs).Patients And MethodsAt our centre we conducted a non-randomised, non-comparative retrospective analysis of records of 31 patients with intraocular foreign bodies treated using pars plana vitrectomy and other conventional surgical techniques during a 3-year period between January 2006 and December 2008. Using the OTS classification for ocular injuries (United States Eye Injury Registry [USEIR]), we evaluated the visual outcome and various pre-, intra- and postoperative clinical factors.ResultsAlmost all patients (96.8 %) were male with a mean age of 32.29 years ± 13.38 SD (SD = standard deviation). The most common cause of ocular injury was hammering (58 %), in 27 cases the IOFB was magnetic. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 34 months with a mean of 4.5 months. In 30 eyes, the IOFBs could be removed during the first surgery. The average time between injury and surgery was 15.78 ± 23.45 SD hours for 27 patients (87.1 %). In 3 cases the intraocular foreign body (IOFB) was removed 7, 9, 14 days after the injury. In one case the IOFB was removed in a second surgery 40 days after the injury. In 23 cases we performed pars plana vitrectomy, for 8 patients we performed anterior segment surgery, in 21 cases the lens was also removed. At the time of surgery initial vitreous haemorrhage was present in 17 patients (54.8 %). OTS score for ocular injury was calculated as 2.45 ± 0.78 SD. Initial visual acuity was below 20 / 200 in 61.3 % of the cases. Subsequent to surgical treatment over a mean follow-up of 2.5 months, 25 patients (80.64 %) achieved a visual acuity of 20 / 200 or better (0.69 ± 0.35 SD). Best corrected visual acuity was significantly better for ocular injuries with a higher OTS score (p = 0.000095). Other significant factors for good visual outcome were good initial visual acuity (p = 0.002), the absence of vitreal haemorrhagies (p = 0.024) and small size of the IOFB (p = 0.043). Postoperative complications included retinal detachment (9.67 %), endophthalmitis (3.22 %) and PVR (3.22 %).ConclusionAcceptable visual results could be achieved after the removal of posterior segment IOFBs by vitrectomy. A reliable classification of ocular injuries may provide significant information about the prognosis of injuries with intraocular foreign bodies.© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…