• Colorectal Dis · Feb 2012

    Meta Analysis

    Primary closure or rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for the management of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    • J Horwood, D Hanratty, P Chandran, and P Billings.
    • Department of General Surgery, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK. tipper111@aol.com
    • Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb 1;14(2):143-51.

    AimSacrococcygeal pilonidal disease is a common condition afflicting the young male working and student population, resulting in considerable pain, embarrassment and loss of work days. Controversy surrounds the most appropriate surgical approach to achieve low recurrence rates whilst minimizing morbidity and permitting an early return to work. This study aims to review the published literature comparing excision followed by either primary suture or rhomboid flap repair.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed, by two independent investigators, for relevant randomized controlled trials. Keywords and MeSH terms included 'pilonidal disease', 'primary suture/repair', 'rhomboid flap' and 'limberg/modified Limberg flap'. 'Related study' function and manuscript bibliographies were searched for further relevant studies. Study quality was assessed using the Jadad score. Meta-analysis was performed on pooled data, utilizing a random effects model when heterogeneity was high and a fixed effects model when heterogeneity was low. The primary end-point assessed was disease recurrence. Secondary end-points included wound dehiscence, pain scores, hospital stay and return to work.ResultsSix studies were eventually included for pooled analysis following exclusion of randomized controlled trials with poor methodology. Two studies compared 'off-midline' (Karydakis) primary suture with the Limberg flap repair. Six hundred and forty-one patients were included (331 flap repairs). Rhomboid flap excision demonstrated a trend towards less disease recurrence (P = 0.07), lower wound infection (P = 0.001) and dehiscence (P = 0.01). However, no significant difference was found for pain scores, hospital stay or return to work.ConclusionThe current published literature supports the use of the rhomboid flap excision and the Limberg flap-repair procedures over primary midline suture techniques for the elective management of primary pilonidal disease. Further high-quality studies are necessary to compare flap with off-midline repairs.© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…