• T D East, L K Heermann, R L Bradshaw, A Lugo, R M Sailors, L Ershler, C J Wallace, A H Morris, B McKinley, A Marquez, A Tonnesen, L Parmley, W Shoemaker, P Meade, P Thaut, T Hill, M Young, J Baughman, M Olterman, V Gooder, B Quinn, W Summer, V Valentine, J Carlson, and K Steinberg.
• Department of Medical Informatics, Cottonwood Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah 84107, USA.
• Proc AMIA Symp. 1999 Jan 1:251-5.

Abstract200 adult respiratory distress syndrome patients were included in a prospective multicenter randomized trial to determine the efficacy of computerized decision support. The study was done in 10 medical centers across the United States. There was no significant difference in survival between the two treatment groups (mean 2 = 0.49 p = 0.49) or in ICU length of stay between the two treatment groups when controlling for survival (F(1df) = 0.88, p = 0.37.) There was a significant reduction in morbidity as measured by multi-organ dysfunction score in the protocol group (F(1df) = 4.1, p = 0.04) as well as significantly lower incidence and severity of overdistension lung injury (F(1df) = 45.2, p < 0.001). We rejected the null hypothesis. Efficacy was best for the protocol group. Protocols were used for 32,055 hours (15 staff person years, 3.7 patient years or 1335 patient days). Protocols were active 96% of the time. 38,546 instructions were generated. 94% were followed. This study indicates that care using a computerized decision support system for ventilator management can be effectively transferred to many different clinical settings and significantly improve patient morbidity.

15 keywords...

hide…