• Anthony T Gerlach, Joseph F Dasta, Steven Steinberg, Larry C Martin, and Charles H Cook.
• Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. gerlach.6@osu.edu
• J Crit Care. 2009 Dec 1;24(4):568-74.

BackgroundAlthough no ideal sedative exists, dexmedetomidine is unique because it produces sedation and analgesia without decreasing the respiratory drive. Hemodynamic responses to dexmedetomidine are variable and dependent on the patient population. Our initial experience was associated with an unacceptable incidence of hypotension and bradycardia. We evaluated occurrence of hypotension and bradycardia in critically ill surgical patients receiving dexmedetomidine before and after implementation of a dosing protocol.MethodsThis is a retrospective chart review of all admissions to a university medical center-based, 44-bed surgical intensive care unit pre and post protocol implementation.ResultsForty-four patients received dexmedetomidine including 19 historic controls and 25 dosed via protocol. Both groups had comparable demographics and initial and maximum dosages of dexmedetomidine. Use of the dosing protocol resulted in fewer dosage changes (mean +/- standard deviation, 4.8 +/- 3.8 compared to 7.8 +/- 3.9; P = .014) and fewer episodes of hypotension (16% vs 68.4%; P = .0006) but did not influence bradycardic episodes (20% vs 15.5%; P > .99).ConclusionWe found that use of a protocol that increases the time interval between dosage adjustments may reduce dexmedetomidine-associated hypotension.

29 keywords...

hide…