• Der Unfallchirurg · Jan 2007

    Comparative Study

    [Comparison of C-arm CT and standard imaging in osteosyntheses of fractured distal radius specimens].

    • S Wirth, E Euler, D Kotsianos-Hermle, M Treitl, U Linsenmaier, K-J Pfeifer, M Reiser, and W Mutschler.
    • Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, München. Stefan.Wirth@med.uni-muenchen.de
    • Unfallchirurg. 2007 Jan 1;110(1):41-8.

    BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of C-arm CT imaging of the distal radius with standard patient positioning in intraoperative assessment of plate osteosynthesis.Materials And MethodsFour complete distal radius specimens from human cadavers were fractured (type C), and internal fixation with palmar plates (stainless steel) was then carried out in each. On the basis of C-arm fluoroscopy, radiography and C-arm CT (Siremobil Iso-C3D, scans with forearm bones positioned parallel to the z-axis), 19 observers subsequently evaluated the positions of screws near the joint and any steps within the joint, after which the bones were surgically exposed and the imaging results checked against direct visual observations.ResultsNo statistically significant differences were detected either between the modalities or between the evaluator groups.ConclusionWith standard patient positioning, the performance of C-arm CT was equivalent to and not better than that of current standard procedures, i.e. intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiography. Further studies should examine whether this holds true in clinical practice with representative patient collectives when titanium implants are used and/or optimized patient positioning is practised.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…