• J Orthop Trauma · Jun 2010

    Technical problems and complications in the removal of the less invasive stabilization system.

    • Takashi Suzuki, Wade R Smith, Philip F Stahel, Steven J Morgan, Andrea J Baron, and David J Hak.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Denver Health Medical Centre, University of Colorado at Denver, School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
    • J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Jun 1;24(6):369-73.

    ObjectivesThis study was designed to evaluate the frequency of intraoperative problems and complications involved with Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) plate removal.DesignRetrospective study.SettingSingle academic level I trauma center.MethodsMedical records were reviewed for demographics, surgical technique, plate length, number and position of screws, time from internal fixation to plate removal, reason for removal, operating time for removal, and perioperative complications. Pre- and post-op radiographs were also reviewed to confirm plate and screw positions. The independent factors including age, sex, plate site, plate screws placed/available holes, union status, and time from internal fixation to removal were compared between patients in whom screw removal was complicated to those in whom screw removal proceeded without difficulty. Mann-Whitney and Fisher Exact tests were calculated with the level of significance at P < 0.05.ResultsThere were 33 patients (24 men and 9 women) that underwent LISS plate removal from 36 extremities (15 tibias and 21 femurs). The average time from internal fixation to removal was 13.2 months. The plates removed were 13-hole plates (16 cases), 9-hole plates (18 cases), and 5-hole plates (2 cases), which included a total of 349 screws. The specific reasons for plate removal were symptomatic implants after bone union (21 cases), nonunion requiring additional fixation (12 cases), early loss of fixation (2 cases), and a peri-implant fracture after bone union (1 case). The average operating time for plate removal was 71.3 minutes (range, 28-180 minutes). Five cases required more than 120 minutes. Difficulty with screw removal was encountered in 37 screws (10.6%) from 14 cases (38.9%). Two plates and 11 screw heads required cutting using a carbide or diamond tipped burr. Six cases required tearing the plate off bone by levering with a total of 10 screws still attached. Five screws were cut using a large bolt cutter. The other screws were stripped and removed with a stripped screw removal tap. Two patients developed a postoperative superficial wound infection that required treatment with oral antibiotics. One patient had a postoperative peroneal nerve palsy that recovered spontaneously. There were no statistical differences in predictors for patients with screw removal difficulty.ConclusionsDifficulty with removal due to cold welding or screw head stripping is common in locking LISS plate screws. LISS plate removal can often require prolonged operating time and the use of specialized removal tools. Surgeons should anticipate the possibility of difficulties when removing these implants and be appropriately prepared.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…