• Takuro Sanuki, Hiroki Son, Naotaka Kishimoto, and Junichiro Kotani.
• Staff Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan. sanuki-t@cc.osakadent.ac.jp
• J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009 Aug 1;67(8):1615-8.

PurposeThis study compared the Portex introducer, ivory type (PII) (Portex Tracheal Tube Introducer; SIMS Portex, Hythe, Kent, England), and Cook Airway Exchange Catheter (CAEC) (Cook, Letchworth, Hertfordshire, England) with regard to success rate of and time required for tracheal intubation by use of each device by oral and maxillofacial surgeons on a manikin.Materials And MethodsThe subjects comprised 17 oral and maxillofacial surgeons who intubated the trachea of the manikin with each device. The PII or CAEC was inserted into the trachea of the manikin and advanced 26 cm from the upper incisor, and the time required for intubation was measured. The subjects were then asked to rate the difficulty of intubation using a 10-cm visual analog scale.ResultsThe mean intubation time, averaged over 3 attempts, was significantly shorter for the PII (7.92 +/- 3.15 seconds) than for the CAEC (11.44 +/- 3.98 seconds) (P < .001). The rate of successful intubation with the PII (88.2%) was significantly greater than that with the CAEC (37.3%) (P < .001). With regard to the overall difficulty of intubation, as rated by the 10-cm visual analog scale, the PII (median, 45 mm [10th-90th percentile, 32-53 mm]) was considered less difficult than the CAEC (median, 66 mm [10th-90th percentile, 52-84 mm]) (P < .001).ConclusionsIntubation is faster, more sure, and easier by use of the PII as a tube exchanger than with the CAEC. This may be particularly important for patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery as a result of anatomic changes in the airway, because edema or hematoma in the upper airway often leads to failed intubation. We conclude that the PII is useful as a tube exchanger.

15 keywords...

hide…