• A Schulz-Baldes, D Huseman, A Loui, J W Dudenhausen, and M Obladen.
• Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Zurich University Centre for Ethics, Zurich, Switzerland.
• Acta Paediatr. 2007 May 1;96(5):681-7.

AimTo investigate the end-of-life practice in a large perinatal centre in Germany.MethodsRetrospective chart review was performed in all neonates deceased in the delivery room (n = 31) and the neonatal intensive care unit (n = 47) between 2002 and 2004.ResultsNeonatal death was preceded by an end-of-life decision (EOLD) in 81% of cases in the delivery room and 83% in the neonatal intensive care unit. The majority of deceased neonates were born prematurely or with congenital malformation. Life-sustaining treatment was not initiated in 74% of the infants deceased in the delivery room. In the unit, 52% died after withdrawal of therapy. Mechanical ventilation was withdrawn most frequently (79% of cases). Futility and immediate death were common considerations in EOLD, but the infant's suffering and future quality of life also played a role. Parents were involved in EOLD-making in all but emergency cases. No active termination of life was performed.ConclusionIn our perinatal centre, the majority of neonatal deaths occurred after limitation of therapy. Treatment was actively withdrawn in half of the infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Actual end-of-life practice in a large perinatal centre differs from the restrictive attitude towards EOLD reported for German neonatologists in previous surveys.

22 keywords...

hide…