• Intensive care medicine · Sep 1999

    Comparative Study

    Application of mortality prediction systems to individual intensive care units.

    • P A Patel and B J Grant.
    • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Veterans Affairs Health Care System of Western New York, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, USA.
    • Intensive Care Med. 1999 Sep 1;25(9):977-82.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive accuracy of the severity of illness scoring systems in a single institution.DesignA prospective study conducted by collecting data on consecutive patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit over 20 months. Surgical and coronary care admissions were excluded.SettingVeterans Affairs Medical Center at Buffalo, New York.Patients And ParticipantsData collected on 302 unique, consecutive patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit.InterventionsNone.Measurements And ResultsData required to calculate the patients' predicted mortality by the Mortality Probability Model (MPM) II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II scoring systems were collected. The probability of mortality for the cohort of patients was analyzed using confidence interval analyses, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, two by two contingency tables and the Lemeshow-Hosmer chi-square statistic. Predicted mortality for all three scoring systems lay within the 95 % confidence interval for actual mortality. For the MPM II, SAPS II and APACHE II, the c-index (equivalent to the area under the ROC curve) was 0.695 +/- 0.0307 SE, 0.702 +/- 0.063 SE and 0.672 +/- 0.0306 SE, respectively, which were not statistically different from each other but were lower than values obtained in previous studies.ConclusionAlthough the overall mortality was consistent with the predicted mortality, the poor fit of the data to the model impairs the validity of the result. The observed outcome could be due to erratic quality of care, or differences between the study population and the patient population in the original studies. The data cannot be used to distinguish between these possibilities. To increase predictive accuracy when studying individual intensive care units and enhance quality of care assessments it may be necessary to adapt the model to the patient population.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.