• Eur J Emerg Med · Apr 2014

    Value of anatomic and physiologic scoring systems in outcome prediction of trauma patients.

    • Mohamed Kahloul, Wahid Bouida, Hamdi Boubaker, Semir Toumi, Mohamed H Grissa, Amira Jaafar, Moez Louzi, Riadh Boukef, Mourad Gahbiche, and Semir Nouira.
    • aDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Unit bEmergency Department and Research Unit UR06SP21, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital cDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.
    • Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr 1;21(2):125-9.

    ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to compare the prediction performance of two anatomic scales, the Injury Severity Scale (ISS) and the New Injury Severity Scale (NISS), with two physiologic scales, the Revised Trauma Scale (RTS) and the Simplified Acute Physiology Scale II (SAPS II), in trauma patients.DesignProspective study carried out over a 16-month period.SettingEmergency department of a teaching hospital.PatientsHospitalized victims of trauma up to 14 years of age.InterventionsThe primary endpoint was the survival status at hospital discharge; the secondary outcome was need for ICU admission. Model discrimination was evaluated by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve and model calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic.Measurements And Main ResultsA total of 1136 patients, with an average age of 37.6 years, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mortality rate was 4.5%. The combined rate of hospital death and ICU admission was 17.3%. The ISS and the NISS showed excellent discriminative power for mortality prediction (AUC 0.94 and 0.93, respectively) and ICU admission decision (0.91 and 0.89, respectively), and a good calibration. The SAPS II and the RTS showed lower discriminative power. Combining ISS or NISS with SAPS II did not improve significantly the predictive performance of each scale alone.ConclusionBoth ISS and NISS showed better predictive severity performance compared with RTS and SAPS II in trauma patients. The combination of anatomic scales with physiologic ones did not improve the prediction performance of each scale considered alone.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.