• Sion Jo, Jae Baek Lee, Young Ho Jin, Taeoh Jeong, Jaechol Yoon, Seok Jin Choi, and Boyoung Park.
• aDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju bNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
• Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun 1;21(3):199-205.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of the VitalPAC Early Warning Score-lactate (ViEWS-L) score with that of the trauma and injury severity score (TRISS), which is a pre-existing risk scoring system used in trauma patients.MethodsThe patients were blunt trauma victims admitted consecutively to the study hospital between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2011, who were 15 years or older and had an injury severity score of 9 or higher. The lactate level, the ViEWS and revised trauma score upon arrival at the emergency department, and the injury severity score and TRISS were evaluated. The ViEWS-L score was calculated according to the formula: ViEWS-L=ViEWS+lactate (mmol/l). The ability to predict mortality was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis and calibration analysis.ResultsA total of 299 patients were available for analysis, of whom 33 died (11.0%). The median ViEWS-L score was 3.7 (interquartile range:1.8-6.4) and the median TRISS was 96.8 (interquartile range: 93.4-98.6). The ViEWS-L score was better than TRISS at predicting hospital mortality (AUC, 0.838; 95% confidence interval, 0.771-0.906 vs. AUC, 0.734; 95% confidence interval, 0.635-0.833, P=0.031). Calibration of the ViEWS-L score (χ=11.13, P=0.194) was good but that of TRISS was not (χ=16.97, P=0.018).ConclusionThe prognostic value of the ViEWS-L score in terms of discrimination was better than that of TRISS in the blunt trauma patients admitted to the emergency department with an injury severity score of 9 or higher, and the ViEWS-L score showed good calibration.

40 keywords...

hide…