-
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. · Jan 2011
Comparative StudyChronic kidney disease and 1-year survival in elderly patients discharged from acute care hospitals: a comparison of three glomerular filtration rate equations.
- Andrea Corsonello, Claudio Pedone, Fabrizia Lattanzio, Antonio Cherubini, Graziano Onder, Francesco Corica, Luigi Pranno, Vincenzo Mari, Irma Laino, Sabrina Garasto, Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, and PharmacosurVeillance in the elderly Care study group.
- Unit of Geriatric Pharmacoepidemiology, Italian National Research Centres on Aging, Cosenza, Italy. andrea_corsonello@tin.it
- Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2011 Jan 1;26(1):360-4.
BackgroundGlomerular filtration rate (GFR) is directly associated with survival. However, the prognostic significance of GFR might be different according to the formula used to estimate it. We aimed at comparing the association between GFR estimated using three different formulas and 1-year survival in elderly patients discharged from acute care hospitals.MethodsOur series consisted of 439 patients aged 65 and older admitted to 11 acute care medical wards enrolled in a multicentre prospective observational study. GFR was estimated by body surface area-adjusted Cockcroft-Gault (CG-BSA), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulas. The relative risk of mortality in patients with estimated GFR = 30-59.9 or < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) compared to people with estimated GFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was calculated using Cox regression analysis.ResultsParticipants with reduced GFR showed an increased mortality, regardless of the equation used, and the highest one was associated with CG-BSA-estimated GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). After adjusting for potential confounders, CKD-EPI-estimated GFR remained significantly associated with the outcome [30-59.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), hazard ratio (HR) = 1.70, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.02-2.98; < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.20-5.66], while the strength of the association was clearly reduced for MDRD (30-59.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 0.83-2.38; < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.01-4.30) and CG-BSA (30-59.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 1.79, 95% CI = 0.67-4.53; < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 2.68, 95% CI = 0.92-7.55).ConclusionGFR adds to the list of prognostic indicators in elderly and frail people, and CKD-EPI-derived GFR, which outperforms to some extent MDRD and CG-BSA-derived GFR in a multivariable predictive model, seems worthy of testing in wider populations.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.