• Keisuke Nishigawa, Kazuo Kondo, Hisahiro Takeuchi, and Glenn T Clark.
• Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
• J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr 1;89(4):412-7.

Statement Of ProblemNo effective method has been found to fully control sleep bruxism, although contingent feedback methods show some promise.PurposeThis demonstration-of-concept study evaluated the effect of contingent electrical lip stimulation on sleep bruxism.Material And MethodsRecordings of masseter muscle activity were performed over 5 nights in 7 subjects with acknowledged bruxism and dental attrition (5 men, 2 women). A small electrical switch, activated with light force clenching, was mounted between 2 occlusal orthotics. This switch triggered a stimulator, which delivered slightly noxious electrical pulses to the subject's lip. After a baseline first night recording session, stimulation was delivered in 1-hour blocks for half of each sleep period during nights 2 through 5. Paired t tests (alpha = 0.05) were conducted on 4 recorded bruxism parameters.ResultsWith stimulation, the number (+/-SD) of events/hour reduced from a baseline level of 3.9 +/- 2.0 to 2.4 +/- 0.8 and the mean amplitude (% maximum voluntary contraction) reduced from 28.7 +/- 20.0 to 17.6 +/- 4.1. There was a mean decrease in the duration (s/event) from 10.6 +/- 1.4 to 9.1 +/- 2.5 and the total event time (s/hour) was reduced from 41.7 +/- 22.4 to 23.2 +/- 11.0. Among these measures, bruxism events with and without stimulation were compared, and only the duration of individual bruxism events (s/event) showed a significant change (P=.038). Finally, no subject reported being awakened from sleep by the stimulation.ConclusionThe reductions in bruxism events were noteworthy, especially considering that stimulation was delivered for only half of the sleeping period.

22 keywords...

hide…