• Medicina intensiva · Oct 2010

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    [Spontaneous breathing trial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus T-piece].

    • F J Molina-Saldarriaga, N J Fonseca-Ruiz, D P Cuesta-Castro, A Esteban, and F Frutos-Vivar.
    • Clínica Universitaria Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia. nfonseca@une.net.co
    • Med Intensiva. 2010 Oct 1;34(7):453-8.

    ObjectiveTo determine if the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is superior to SBT with a T-piece in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).DesignA blind clinical test with random distribution.SettingThree medical-surgical intensive care units.PatientsA random sample of 50 patients with COPD who had received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours and who were considered to fulfill weaning criteria: resolution of the exacerbation of the COPD disease, Glasgow scale >10, temperature ≤ 38°C, PaO(2) /FiO(2) quotient >150 with an external PEEP ≤5cm H(2)O and FiO(2) ≤ to 50%, hemoglobin >10g/dl, no need for vasoactive drugs (except for dopamine ≤5μg/kg/min or dobutamine ≤5μg/kg/min) or for sedative agents and effective cough.InterventionA 30-minute spontaneous respiration trial with T-piece system or CPAP.VariablesSuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation, successful SBT, reintubation and intrinsic PEEP.ResultsOut of 25 patients who were assigned to the T-tube group, 18 successfully completed the trial and were extubated; 3 of them requiring reintubation. Out of 25 patients who were assigned to the CPAP group, 19 were extubated and none of them required reintubation. There was successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in 76% in SBT-CPAP vs 60% in SBT-TT (relative risk 1.27; 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.87).ConclusionIn a COPD patient cohort, the performance of spontaneous breathing with CPAP showed a tendency to better outcome than with T-Piece, however, further research is needed.Copyright © 2010 Elsevier España, S.L. y SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.