• J. Surg. Res. · Nov 2010

    Brain natriuretic peptide is not reno-protective during renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat.

    • Tad Kim, P Kent Harman, Robert Lyons, Roger B Gaskins, Charles E Hobson, Stephen M Evans, Curtis G Tribble, A Ahsan Ejaz, and Thomas M Beaver.
    • Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0286, USA.
    • J. Surg. Res. 2010 Nov 1;164(1):e13-9.

    BackgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in 30% of patients undergoing complex cardiovascular surgery, and renal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is often a contributing factor. A recent meta-analysis observed that perioperative natriuretic peptide administration was associated with a reduction in AKI requiring dialysis in cardiovascular surgery patients. This study was designed to further clarify the potential reno-protective effect of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) using an established rat model of renal I/R injury.MethodsThe study comprised three groups (n = 10 kidneys each): (1) control (no injury); (2) I/R injury (45 min of bilateral renal ischemia followed by 3 h of reperfusion); and (3) BNP (I/R injury plus rat-BNP pretreatment at 0.01 μg/kg/min). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and a biomarker of AKI, urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL), were measured at baseline and at 30 minute intervals post-ischemia. Groups were compared using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (mean ± SD, significance P < 0.05).ResultsBaseline GFR measurements for control, I/R, and BNP groups were 1.07 ± 0.55, 0.88 ± 0.51, and 1.03 ± 0.59 mL/min (P = 0.90), respectively. Post-ischemia, GFR was significantly lower in I/R and BNP compared with controls at 30 min, 1.29 ± 0.97, 0.08 ± 0.04, and 0.06 ± 0.05 mL/min (P < 0.01), and remained lower through 3 h, 1.79 ± 0.44, 0.30 ± 0.17, and 0.32 ± 0.12 mL/min (P < 0.01). Comparing I/R to BNP groups, GFR did not differ significantly at any time point. There was no significant difference in uNGAL levels at 1 h (552 ± 358 versus 516 ± 259 ng/mL, P = 0.87) or 2 h (1073 ± 589 versus 989 ± 218 ng/mL, P = 0.79) between I/R and BNP.ConclusionsBNP does not reduce the renal injury biomarker, urinary NGAL, or preserve GFR in acute renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.