-
Chirurgia Bucharest · Nov 2004
[Predictive value of diagnostic tests in polytrauma patients with abdominal and craniocerebral injuries].
- V Păunescu and Teodora Coman.
- Clinica Chirurgie Generală, Spitalul Clinic de Urgenţă Bagdasar-Arseni, Bucureşti.
- Chirurgia Bucharest. 2004 Nov 1;99(6):545-55.
AbstractIn a study on 1024 polytrauma patients with craniocerebral injury, abdominal injury was present in 206 (20.11%) of them. In order to identify the intraabdominal organs injury, physical examination and specific diagnostic tests will be used. Their value was calculated by means of informational indices. The main indices, sensitivity, positive predictive value and accuracy were: for physical examination = 81.06%, 90.3%, 94.72%; for peritoneal lavage = 94.17%, 95.12%, 97.94%; for abdominal computed tomography = 98.44%, 97.65% and 99.25%. As one might expect the abdominal computed tomography is the most accurate method for the diagnosis of intraabdominal organs injuries.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.