• Dig. Dis. Sci. · Sep 2003

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of a salivary/sputum pepsin assay with 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring for detection of gastric reflux into the proximal esophagus, oropharynx, and lung.

    • Sunitha Potluri, Frank Friedenberg, Henry P Parkman, Alan Chang, Robert MacNeal, Christopher Manus, Matthew Q Bromer, Aslam Malik, Robert S Fisher, Thomas Nugent, Vinod K Thangada, Friedrich Kueppers, and Larry S Miller.
    • Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.
    • Dig. Dis. Sci. 2003 Sep 1;48(9):1813-7.

    AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine whether measurement of salivary/sputum pepsin could be used as a surrogate marker for detecting gastroesophageal reflux using 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring as the gold standard. Patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms underwent simultaneous 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring and collection of saliva and sputum samples for pepsin measurement using a recently developed assay. In all, 16 patients provided 19 positive (10.6%) and 161 negative pepsin assays. The mean pH values for the positive pepsin samples were lower then the negative samples at both the proximal [5.34 (95% CI, 4.94-5.75) vs 6.12 (95% CI, 6.03-6.20; P < 0.01)] and distal [4.97 (95% CI, 4.61-5.33) vs 6.03 (95% CI, 5.92-6.15; P < 0.01)] pH probes. Proximal esophageal reflux was not detected in patients who had a negative pepsin assay (N = 12); in contrast, proximal esophageal reflux was documented in three of four patients with a positive assay. In conclusion, detection of pepsin in the saliva and/or sputum may provide a noninvasive method to test for the proximal reflux of gastric contents.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…