• Ugeskrift for laeger · Apr 1992

    [Cost-benefit analysis of electric stimulation of the spinal cord in the treatment of angina pectoris].

    • M B Rasmussen, C Andersen, P Andersen, and F Frandsen.
    • Odense Universitet, Okonomisk Institut.
    • Ugeskr. Laeg. 1992 Apr 20;154(17):1180-4.

    AbstractSince August 1988, in Odense Hospital, electric spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been employed for the treatment of pain in patients with confirmed ischaemic heart disease who suffer from incapacitating angina pectoris despite maximal medical/surgical treatment. The object of the present investigation was to assess not only the social economic consequences of SCS treatment (cost-utility analysis) but also altered quality of life in SCS patients (perception of pain, mobility, function in daily life and physical activity). Sixteen consecutive SCS patients all of whom were resident in the County of Funen and who were submitted to implantation of an SCS system during the period August 1988 to December 1989, participated in this investigation. The results are based on data from the year prior to SCS implantation compared with the subsequent time with SCS treatment. Saving was found at hospital level (reduction in number of admissions) og 40,200 Danish crowns/annum/patient (approximately IJ 3,000) (1989 prices), and for non-hospital related expenses a corresponding saving of 16,289 Danish crowns/annum/patient (approximately IJ 1,600) was found mainly on account of reduction in the amount of home nursing required. The total saving was found to constitute 56,489 Danish crowns/annum/patient (approximately IJ 5,600). In addition, improvements were registered in all respects which constituted assessment of the quality of life of the patients.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.