• S Murray, K G Carson, P D Ewings, P D Collins, and M A James.
• Department of Cardiology, Taunton and Somerset Hospital, Musgrove Park, Taunton Somerset TA1 5DA, UK. doc.steve.murray@mailexcite.com
• Heart. 1999 Jul 1;82(1):89-92.

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the need for acute admissions for chest pain in patients with refractory angina pectoris.DesignRetrospective analysis of case records.Patients19 consecutive patients implanted for SCS between 1987 and 1997. All had three vessel coronary disease, and all were in New York Heart Association functional group III/IV.MethodsAdmission rates were calculated for three separate periods: (1) from initial presentation up until last revascularisation; (2) from last revascularisation until SCS implantation; (3) from SCS implantation until the study date. Post-revascularisation rates were then compared with post-SCS rates, without including admissions before revascularisation, as this would bias against revascularisation procedures.ResultsAnnual admission rate after revascularisation was 0.97/patient/year, compared with 0.27 after SCS (p = 0.02). Mean time in hospital/patient/year after revascularisation was 8.3 days v 2.5 days after SCS (p = 0.04). No unexplained new ECG changes were observed during follow up and patients presented with unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction in the usual way.ConclusionsSCS is effective in preventing hospital admissions in patients with refractory angina, without masking serious ischaemic symptoms or leading to silent infarction.

18 keywords...

hide…