• The Journal of pediatrics · Jul 1994

    Urine testing in young febrile children: a risk-benefit analysis.

    • M S Kramer, S M Tange, K N Drummond, and E L Mills.
    • Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
    • J. Pediatr. 1994 Jul 1;125(1):6-13.

    ObjectiveTo assess the relative risks and benefits of 10 potential urine testing strategies (compared with no testing) involving urinalysis and urine culture for children aged 3 to 24 months with fever but no focus of bacterial infection.DesignDecision analysis based on the literature. The 10 testing strategies consist of five pairs; within each pair of strategies, one calls for urinalysis and urine culture of a clean-voided (bag) specimen, and urine culture, and in the other, the urine specimen is sent for culture only if the result of the urinalysis is abnormal. The five pairs differ in selectivity for testing: all children, girls only, temperature > or = 39 degrees C only, fever only (no respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms), or temperature > or = 40 degrees C only. The results of the decision analysis are expressed as the preventive fraction (the proportion of cases prevented) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and hypertension, and as two risk/benefit (RB) ratios: the number of children tested per case of ESRD prevented (RB1), and the number of children with false-positive diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infection per case of ESRD prevented (RB2).ResultsOn the basis of the available evidence, none of the testing strategies succeeds in preventing the majority of cases of ESRD and hypertension (preventive fraction = 0.10 to 0.50), and all are associated with high ratios of children tested (RB1 = 4167 to 12,500) and false-positive diagnosis and treatment (RB2 = 563 to 1800) per case of ESRD prevented. A strategy of combined urinalysis and urine culture in children with temperature > or = 39 degrees C is associated with the most favorable RB profile: preventive fraction = 0.45, RB1 = 5556; RB2 = 776. Sensitivity analyses indicate that the relative ranking of the strategies is relatively robust in regard to alterations in the estimates of the sensitivity or specificity of the urinalysis, the relative risk of renal scarring associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment, and the risk of scarring-induced hypertension or ESRD.ConclusionsUp to 50% of the long-term sequelae of occult urinary tract infections in young febrile children appear preventable by urine testing, but even the most favorable strategies require testing of thousands of children, and unnecessarily treating hundreds, for every case prevented. Our analysis reveals those strategies with more favorable RB profiles and emphasizes the need for rapid and convenient urine tests with much higher sensitivity and specificity or the need for less aggressive management strategies for febrile infants and young children with urinary tract infection.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…