• Jinglan Wang, Max Harry Weil, Wanchun Tang, Yun-Te Chang, and Lei Huang.
• The Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, 35100 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270, United States.
• Resuscitation. 2007 Mar 1;72(3):477-83.

ObjectiveThe present study was undertaken to compare an animal model of electrically induced VF with ischemically induced VF. In a preponderance of models of cardiac arrest and resuscitation in intact animals, ventricular fibrillation (VF) is induced by an alternating current delivered directly to the epicardium or endocardium. Yet, the applicability of such animal models has been challenged for it is not an electrical current alone but rather a current generated in the ischemic myocardium that triggers VF. Accordingly, a potentially more clinically relevant model was investigated in which spontaneous VF followed acute myocardial ischemia.MethodsTwenty anesthetized pigs were randomized to either electrical fibrillation or myocardial ischemia following transient occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery.ResultsVF was untreated for 7 min in both models after which mechanical ventilation and precordial compression were begun. Defibrillation was attempted after 5 min of CPR in both groups. VF appeared within 5.7+/-2.0 min of LAD occlusion.ConclusionsA significant increase in the number of post-resuscitation premature ventricular beats and recurrent VF followed ROSC and a significantly greater number of shocks was required for restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after LAD occlusion. Nevertheless, early post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction, neurological recovery and 72 h survival were indistinguishable between the two models.

16 keywords...

hide…