• Igor V Voskresensky, Tanya Rivera-Tyler, Lesly A Dossett, William P Riordan, and Bryan A Cotton.
• Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, USA.
• J. Surg. Res. 2009 Jun 1;154(1):105-11.

IntroductionThe Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS) has been previously validated to predict outcomes in nonintubated, nonparalyzed trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of scene vital signs on predicting survival in intubated trauma patients.MethodsOur Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons was reviewed for all trauma patients admitted between 10/01/04 and 09/30/06, arriving by aeromedical transport. TRISS was evaluated for each patient based on their (1) scene vital signs and (2) arrival vital signs. Additionally, the "TRISS-like" score was calculated for each patient. Expected mortality for each score was measured against observed mortality.ResultsFour thousand four hundred ninety-nine Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons patients were admitted during the study period; 695 (15%) were transported by air; 163 patients (23%) arrived intubated; 480 arrived nonintubated. Observed survival in the intubated group was 76%. Observed survival in the nonintubated group was 100%. TRISS using scene vital signs more closely predicted mortality among intubated patients than the other scoring systems (69% versus 39% using TRISS-arrival versus 80% using TRISS-like). Scene vital signs with TRISS also resulted in fewer "unexpected" outcomes (survivors and deaths).ConclusionsTraditionally, patients arriving at trauma centers intubated are either excluded from the trauma registry or have their physiological score "modified" to account for pharmacologically altered respiratory rate and Glasgow Coma Scale. In intubated patients, TRISS using scene vital signs more reliably predicts survival and does so with far fewer "unexpected" outcomes than with other available scoring systems.

29 keywords...

hide…