• J. Pediatr. Surg. · May 2011

    Comparative Study

    Outcome of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in surgical and medical neonates.

    • Ike Njere, Saidul Islam, Deborah Parish, Jauro Kuna, and Alireza S Keshtgar.
    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, National Health Service Trust, SE13 6LH London, UK.
    • J. Pediatr. Surg. 2011 May 1;46(5):946-50.

    Background/PurposePeripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) are commonly used for neonatal vascular access. The aim of this study was to look at PICC line complication rates and possible predictors of PICC infection in a neonatal intensive care unit.MethodThis was a prospective study of 226 neonates who had PICCs on our neonatal intensive care unit between January 2006 and June 2009. Complete data was available on 218 neonates who had 294 PICC lines. Criteria for catheter-related sepsis was positive blood cultures (peripheral/central) and/or a positive catheter tip culture after removal in the presence of a clinical suspicion of line sepsis.ResultsOf 218 neonates, 132 (169 lines) were medical, and 86 (125 lines) were surgical. Our PICC line infection rate was 17 infections per 1000 catheter-days. Surgical neonates had infection rates of 24.8% compared with 18.3% of medical neonates (P < .18). The odds ratio for a PICC infection was 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.64-5.87) if the catheter was in situ for 9 days or more, P < .01. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus was isolated from 55 (89%) of 62 blood cultures.ConclusionsOur PICC infection rate was 17 per 1000 catheter-days. The length of catheter stay was the only predictor of PICC infection.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.