• Tom van Zundert and Joseph Brimacombe.
• Department of Anaesthesia, Cairns Hospital, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia. t.van.zundert@MUMC.nl
• Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2012 Apr 1;44(2):63-70.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressures of four different laryngeal masks in paediatric patients undergoing routine surgery and to determine whether there is a substantial increase in cuff pressure when silicone masks are used compared to PVC laryngeal mask airways.MethodsHundred and forty patients aged < 16 yr were randomly allocated to receive one of four extra glottic airway devices: LMA-Classic; LMA-Unique; Soft Seal; or Cobra-PLA. Intracuff pressure was monitored continuously throughout the operative intervention. The primary outcome was measurement of an increase in cuff pressure. First attempt success rate, effective airway time, anatomical position of the airway and incidence of airway morbidity data were monitored.ResultsMean cuff pressure increased within 5 min of N2O exposure, and was substantially higher in the silicone LMA-C,compared to the PVC-based extra glottic airway devices tested, reaching a plateau of the cuff pressure after 45 min.The overall first attempt success rate (97%) and the mean effective airway time (24 ± 9 sec) were very satisfactory and all patients underwent successful surgery. Anatomical position was adequate in most airways, although in 34%of the patients in the Cobra group herniation of either the epiglottis or arytenoids were detected. Airway morbidity due to the devices was insignificant.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated a substantial increase in cuff pressure during anaesthesia for children in whom a silicone-based LMA-C was used, whereas PVC-based extra glottic airway devices showed a much lower increase.

16 keywords...

hide…