• Su Man Cha, Sihyun Park, Hyun Kang, Chong Wha Baek, Yong Hun Jung, Young Joo Cha, and Junyong In.
• *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon ‡Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ∥Department of Laboratory Medicine §Medical Device Clinical Trials Center, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul ¶Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University Medical Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea †School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
• Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Jun 1;24(3):216-20.

BackgroundWe compared the quantitative clinical performances of the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA ProSeal) regarding intensity of gastric distension in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MethodsA total of 124 anesthetized, paralyzed patients (ASA 1 to 2; aged, 18 to 80 y) were randomly allocated for airway management with the SLIPA or LMA ProSeal. After induction of general anesthesia using total intravenous anesthesia and rocuronium, the intensity of gastric distension was accessed twice by 2 raters, respectively. We also compared the fiberoptic bronchoscopic view of the glottis, the severity of blood stain, and postoperative sore throat.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between groups for each gastric size. The change of gastric size within the SLIPA group was not statistically significant for both raters. Change within the LMA ProSeal group was significant in rater 2 (P=0.045) and marginally significant for rater 1 (P=0.056). Anatomic fit, complications during emergence, and the severity of blood stain and postoperative sore throat were similar in both groups.ConclusionsSLIPA is as efficacious as LMA ProSeal for use in patients without severe complications who are undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

28 keywords...

hide…