• Jason J Hoth, Melanie J Scott, Timothy K Bullock, Nicole A Stassen, Glen A Franklin, and J David Richardson.
• Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA.
• Am Surg. 2003 Dec 1;69(12):1108-11.

AbstractThe indications for performing as urgent thoractomy after trauma are based on the criteria used for penetrating injuries. However, few data are available on the use of these indications for patients with blunt injuries. In a retrospective study (June 1996 to July 2001), we compared the indications of urgent thoracotomy after blunt injury and penetrating injury in patients who underwent thoracotomy within 24 hours of hospital admission at our institution. Patients with blunt aortic injuries or emergency department thoracotomies were excluded from evaluation. Fifty-nine patients were identified (37 penetrating injuries, 22 blunt injuries). Blunt trauma victims had a higher mortality rate than penetrating trauma victims (73% vs. 22%). Chest tube output was the indication for nontherapuetic thoracotomy in 5 patients with blunt injuries whereas this occurred in only 1 penetrating injury victim (P = 0.04). All 5 blunt injury patients underwent a prior procedure and were coagulopathic when thoracotomy was performed. In conclusion, thoracotomy following blunt trauma is associated with a high rate of mortality. The rate of nontherapeutic exploration is increased when chest tube output is the indication for thoracotomy after blunt trauma. Since the majority of such patients have multicavitary injuries that require prior operation and are commonly coagulopathic, caution should be exercised when deciding whether to proceed with thoracotomy based solely on chest tube output.

14 keywords...

hide…