• Spine · Oct 2004

    Transcranial electrical stimulation as predictor of elicitation of intraoperative muscle-evoked potentials.

    • Yuko Fukuoka, Hiromichi Komori, Shigenori Kawabata, Harunobu Ohkubo, Kiyoshi Mochida, and Kenichi Shinomiya.
    • Section of Orthopedic and Spinal Surgery, Graduate School of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. fukuoka.orth@tmd.ac.jp
    • Spine. 2004 Oct 1;29(19):2153-7.

    Study DesignPreoperative electrophysiological and neurologic findings from patients with cervical myelopathy were evaluated statistically to determine their predictive value relative to the success of eliciting intraoperative motor-evoked potentials.ObjectivesTo determine which preoperative variables accurately predicted the success of eliciting an intraoperative muscle-evoked potential.Summary Of Background DataMotor-evoked potential recorded from the muscles after transcranial electrical stimulation is one of the most widely used methods for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring. However, motor-evoked potentials recorded from lower limb muscles are not detectable in patients with severe cervical myelopathy. Therefore, it is helpful to know the probability of the intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation-motor evoked potential elicitation before the operation.MethodsThere were 38 patients with cervical myelopathy. Before the operation, motor-evoked potentials following transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded from the flexor hallucis brevis, and central motor conduction times were measured. Neurologic function was evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association score. During the operation, transcranial electrical stimulation-motor evoked potential from the flexor hallucis brevis was recorded. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score, threshold intensity of magnetic stimulation, and central motor conduction times were statistically evaluated for their potential of being predictors.ResultsThe intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation-motor evoked potential was detectable in all cases in which the preoperative transcranial magnetic stimulation-motor evoked potential was elicited by a lower intensity than 50% of the maximum output of the stimulator. Therefore, simultaneous use of other methods of monitoring should be considered in such cases that need higher output. However, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score or central motor conduction times were not useful criteria. CONCLUSIONS.: The threshold intensity of the preoperative transcranial magnetic stimulation-motor evoked potential was helpful in predicting elicitation of the intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation-motor evoked potential.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…