• Int. J. Cardiol. · Sep 2015

    Multicenter Study Clinical Trial

    Early rule-out and rule-in of myocardial infarction using sensitive cardiac Troponin I.

    • Sophie Druey, Karin Wildi, Raphael Twerenbold, Cédric Jaeger, Tobias Reichlin, Philip Haaf, Maria Rubini Gimenez, Christian Puelacher, Max Wagener, Milos Radosavac, Ursina Honegger, Carmela Schumacher, Valentina Delfine, Philip Kreutzinger, Thomas Herrmann, Moreno WeidmannZoraidaZDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland., Lian Krivoshei, Michael Freese, Claudia Stelzig, Cyril Isenschmid, Stefano Bassetti, Katharina Rentsch, Stefan Osswald, and Christian Mueller.
    • Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital Olten, Switzerland.
    • Int. J. Cardiol. 2015 Sep 15; 195: 163-70.

    BackgroundIt is currently unknown, whether and to what extent sensitive cardiac troponin (s-cTn) allows shortening of the time required for safe rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).MethodsWe aimed to develop and validate early rule-out and rule-in algorithms for AMI using a thoroughly-examined and commonly used s-cTnI assay in a prospective multicenter study including 2173 patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected AMI. S-cTnI was measured in a blinded fashion at 0 h, 1 h, and 2 h. The final diagnosis was centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists. In the derivation cohort (n = 1496), we developed 1h- and 2h-algorithms assigning patients to "rule-out", "rule-in", or "observe". The algorithms were then prospectively validated in the validation cohort (n = 677).ResultsAMI was the adjudicated diagnosis in 17% of patients. After applying the s-cTnI 1h-algorithm developed in the derivation cohort to the validation cohort, 65% of patients were classified as "rule-out", 12% as "rule-in", and 23% to "observe". The negative predictive value for AMI in the "rule-out" group was 98.6% (95% CI, 96.9-99.5), the positive predictive value for AMI in the "rule-in" group 76.3% (95% CI, 65.4-85.1). Overall, 30-day mortality was 0.2% in the "rule-out" group, 1.0% in the "observe" group, and 3.0% in the "rule-in" group. Similar results were obtained for the 2h-algorithm.ConclusionWhen used in conjunction with other clinical information including the ECG, a simple algorithm incorporating s-cTnI values at presentation and after 1h (or 2h) will allow safe rule-out and accurate rule-in of AMI in the majority of patients.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.