• A Kuitunen, M Hynynen, M Salmenperä, J Heinonen, E Vahtera, K Verkkala, and G Myllylä.
• Department of Anaesthesia, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993 Oct 1;37(7):652-8.

AbstractHydroxyethyl starch (HES) is efficacious as a volume expander in cardiac surgical patients, but it may impair the haemostatic mechanisms. However, this latter effect may be less conspicuous with low molecular weight (LMW) solutions than with high molecular weight (HMW) solutions. Therefore, LMW- and HMW-HES solutions were evaluated as priming solutions for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with respect to their effect on haemostasis. Forty-five patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting were prospectively randomised to three groups and received in a double-blind manner as their CPB prime either 20 ml.kg-1 LMW-HES (Mw 120,000), 20 ml.kg-1 HMW-HES (Mw 400,000) or Ringer's acetate 2000 ml. The final volume of the prime was completed to 2000 ml with Ringer's acetate in the HES groups. Anaesthesia and CPB management were standardised. Plasma levels of von Willebrand factor antigen and factor VIII procoagulant activity were significantly more depressed after CPB in both HES-groups as compared with the crystalloid prime group. In addition, APTT was more prolonged and the maximal amplitude of thromboelastographic tracing was more decreased in the HES-groups. It is concluded that it may be advisable to avoid HES solutions in the CPB prime, especially in patients with an increased risk for bleeding after cardiac operations.

10 keywords...

hide…